Formative and Summative Assessment in the Light of Students Perceptions

Authors

  • Mohammad Ali Chughtai, Dr. Sardar Begum Dental College
  • Mariya Khalid, Dr. Sardar Begum Dental College
  • Saira Afridi, Dr. Sardar Begum Dental College
  • Syed Nasir Shah, Dr. Sardar Begum Dental College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.3-2.34

Keywords:

Formative, Summative Assessment, Students Perception

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
To collect information about the Perceptions of dental students regarding Formative and Summative Assessment in Sardar Begum Dental College.
METHODS This cross sectional study was conducted at Sardar Begum Dental College, Peshawar. Pre validated Assessment Experience Questionnaire was used to collect information. All the students of 2nd, 3rd, 4th year BDS and House officers who have joined and continued their bachelors education at Sardar Begum Dental College and Hospital from the first year were invited to participate in this study through Convenience sampling technique after taking verbal and written consent.
RESULTS
Overall response rate was 29.3% in 2nd Year, 35.1% in 3rd year, 75.7% in 4th Year and 92.7% among house officers.60-70% students opined that formative assessment experiences stimulated deep learning and were useful in the preparation for summative assessment. Majority of the students were satisfied with the atmosphere, structure and conduct of summative assessment. More than 70% admitted that they learn more when preparing for summative assessment near the examination. Almost 60% prefer to have more number of SEQs by claiming that these let them apply deep learning. Despite of accepting the contents of OSCE/OSPE as of good quality, majority students from all the professional years were dissatisfied from the time allocation as well as slides and images placed in each station
CONCLUSION
Students like formative assessment mainly because of feedback as it helps them in learning as well as preparing for summative assessment. All parts of summative assessment were more satisfactory for the students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Linquanti R W. Supporting Formative Assessment for Deeper Learning: A Primer for Policymakers. http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/Supporting Formative Assessment for Deeper Learning.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed August 12, 2016

Wiliam D, Lee C, Harrison C BP. Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on students achievement. Assess Educ Policy Pract. 2004;11(1):49-65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208994

Black. P WD. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ. 1998;5(1):7-74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Shepard LA. Commentary: Evaluating the validity of formative and interim assessment. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 2009;28(3):32-37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00152.x

Morgan Jones RL , Wade R RJ. The motivation to learn:efficacy and relevance of the Oswestry postgraduate orthopaedic training programme. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80:271-273

Al- Kadri HM,Al-Moamery MMS, Magzoub ME, Roberts C VC. Students’s Perceptions of the impact of assessment to learning: a comparision between two medical schools with similar curricula. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:44-52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4ddb.fc11

Anwar M HF. Students’s Perception Towards Formative and Summative Assessment: A Single Institution Study. JIIMC. 2016;11(1):35-40

McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC SK. Clinical experiance, performance in final examinations, and learning styles in medical students: prospective study. BMJ. 1998;316:345-350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7128.345

Marton F SR. On qualitative differences in learning: II outcome as a function of the learners conception of the task. Br J Educ Psychol. 1976;46(1):4-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x

Lonka K L-YS. Epistemologies conception of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. High Educ. 1996;31:5-24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129105

Gibbs G SC. Conditions under which supportsstudents learning. Learn Teach High Educ. 2004;1(1):3-31

Edstrom DW, Wilhemsson-Macleod N, Berggren M, Josephson A WC. A Phenomenographic study of students’ conception of learning for a written examination. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:40-46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5513.0eec

Ghiatau R, Diac G C V. Interaction between summative and formative in higher education assessment: Students’s Perception. Pocedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;11:220-224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.065

Figueroa C, Huidobro B, Wright AC, Riquelme A MR. Perceptions of medical students about formative assessments during clinical courses. Rev Med Chil. 2014;142:1193-1199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872014000900014

Jain V A V. Use of Formative assessment as an educational tool. Use Form Assess as an Educ tool. 2012;24:3-4

Baerheim A ME. Medical students proposing questions for their own written final examination: evaluation of an educational project. Med Educ. 2003;37:734-738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01578.x

Sadia S, Sultana S FW. OSCE as an Assessment Tool:Perceptions of Undergraduate Medical Students. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2009;13:65-67

an LT MAJ; FFEB. Introduction of single best answer questions as test of knowledge in the final examination for fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology. R Coll Radiol. 2008;20(18):571-576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2008.05.010

Downloads

Published

2017-03-01

How to Cite

Chughtai, M. A., Khalid, M., Afridi, S., & Shah, S. N. (2017). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Light of Students Perceptions. Journal of Gandhara Medical and Dental Science, 3(2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.3-2.34

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.