Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecological Diseases

Authors

  • Shazia Khattak Hayatabad Medical Complex
  • Sadia Ali MTI/HMC/KGMC Peshawar
  • Nasreen Kishwar Hayatabad Medical Complex
  • Rabeea Sadaf Hayatabad Medical Complex
  • Bushra Rauf Hayatabad Medical Complex
  • Zahida Parveen Hayatabad Medical Complex

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.9-4.325

Keywords:

Cervical Cancer , pap Smear, Cervical Screening , Precancerous Lesions

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the Pap smear screening method’s accuracy in detecting precancerous lesions.

METHODOLOGY

After fulfilling the inclusion criteria patients were selected, the patient’s bladder was emptied and put in a dorsal position, and Cusco’s speculum was introduced after lubrication followed by insertion of Ayer’s spatula, applied on the transformational zone, and rotated in 360 degrees. Specimen smeared on glass slides and sent to the laboratory with fulfilled lab pre-requisite form. Patients were requested to follow up with a histopathology report.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patient was 38.111+9.461 years. Among the 77 patients whose samples were taken 15.4% were asymptomatic, 32.1% with vaginal discharge, 17.9% vaginal discharge,17.0% with intermenstrual bleeding and 16.7% were having lower abdominal pain with p value=0.087. Histopathology reports were interpreted upon follow-up visit among those 1.3% came out to be positive for malignancy, 76.6% negative for malignancy while 22.1% had an inadequate sample.

CONCLUSION

The most common method for screening for cervical cancer is the Pap smear, but its efficacy in detecting early precancerous lesions is very low, possibly due to laboratory error or false technique to a gynecologist of sample technique in our tertiary care hospital. Other screening methods should be used instead of conventional Pap smear.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Shazia Khattak, Hayatabad Medical Complex

Assistant Professor,

Gynae Department, Hayatabad Medical Complex

Sadia Ali, MTI/HMC/KGMC Peshawar

Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics &
Gynecology, MTI/HMC/KGMC Peshawar

Nasreen Kishwar, Hayatabad Medical Complex

Assistant Professor,

Gynae Department, Hayatabad Medical Complex

Rabeea Sadaf, Hayatabad Medical Complex

Associate Professor, Gynae Department,

Hayatabad Medical Complex

Bushra Rauf, Hayatabad Medical Complex

Professor, Gynae Department,

Hayatabad Medical Complex

Zahida Parveen, Hayatabad Medical Complex

SMO Gynae Department,

Hayatabad Medical Complex

References

Esmaeil AM, Olama M, Moharram N. Audit on gynecological surgeries at AL-Zahraa University Hospital 2017. Life Science Journal. 2021;18(11)

Ramdhan RC, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. Anatomical complications of hysterectomy: A review. Clinical Anatomy. 2017 Oct;30(7):946-52

Hafeez R. An Audit of Gynecological Hysterectomies. Journal of Surgery Pakistan. 2021;26(4):145-48

Moen M. Hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus: Total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics. 2016 Sep 1;43(3):431-40

Hakkarainen J, Nevala A, Tomás E, Nieminen K, Malila N, Pitkäniemi J, Auranen A. Decreasing trend and changing indications of hysterectomy in Finland. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica. 2021 Sep;100(9):1722-9

Shaikh AG, Shaikh SN. Abdominal hysterectomy for benign diseases. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (International). 2018 Jul;23:3

Shams RO, Naz SH, Nadeem SA, Khan MH, Noreen S, Rasheed S. Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Specimen. PJMH S. 2020;14(1):344-6

Edmonds K. Dewhurst's Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. John Wiley & Sons; 2018 Nov 12

Luesley DM, Kilby M, editors. Obstetrics & Gynaecology: An evidence-based text for MRCOG. CRC Press; 2016 Mar 30

Marnach ML, Long ME, McGree ME, Weaver AL, Casey PM. Female sexual function improves after endometrial ablation. Journal of Women's Health. 2016 Feb 1;25(2):149-54

Li PC, Tsai I, Hsu CY, Wang JH, Lin SZ, Ding DC, Sung FC. Risk of hyperlipidemia in women with hysterectomy-a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. Scientific reports. 2018 Aug 28;8(1):1-8

Sivapragasam V, Rengasamy CK, Patil AB. An audit of hysterectomies: indications, complications and clinico pathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens in a tertiary care center. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):3689-95

Medhi P, Dowerah S, Borgohain D. A histopathological audit of hysterectomy: experience at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2016 Apr;3(4):1226-8

Tyan P, Amdur R, Berrigan M, Robinson H, Sparks A, Gu A, Wei C, Klebanoff J, Moawad G. Differences in postoperative morbidity among obese patients undergoing abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):464-72

He H, Yang Z, Zeng D, Fan J, Hu X, Ye Y, Bai H, Jiang Y, Lin Z, Lei Z, Li X. Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomies and of abdominal hysterectomies: a case study of 4,895 patients in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. 2016 Apr;28(2):187

Yusuf M, Abba Z, Takai UI. Hysterectomy at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital Kano, Nigeria: A 2 year review. Ibom Medical Journal. 2018 Aug 1;11(2):91-8

Sangri AM, Shaikh AG, Hussain Z, Shar ZA. Gynecological Encounters in Emergency Surgical Procedures. InMed. Forum 2017 Mar; 28 (3):80

Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2017 Jun;129(6):E155-9

Downloads

Published

2022-10-02

How to Cite

Khattak, S., Ali, S. ., Kishwar, N. ., Sadaf, R. ., Rauf, B. ., & Parveen, Z. . (2022). Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecological Diseases. Journal of Gandhara Medical and Dental Science, 9(4), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.9-4.325

Most read articles by the same author(s)