Comparison of Linear Dimensional Accuracy Between One Step and Two-step Impression Technique Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material

Authors

  • Khuda-E- Dad Dentistry
  • Nazia Yazdanie FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore
  • Shafqat Hussain Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar
  • Mohammad Waqas FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore
  • KAPIL KUMAR FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore 
  • Haider Amin Malik FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.9-3.134

Keywords:

Impression technique, linear dimensional accuracy, Additional silicon, polyvinyl siloxane

Abstract

Objectives:

This study compares the linear dimensional accuracy between one step and two-step impression techniques using polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

Methodology:

The Randomized controlled trial was done in the Department of Prosthodontics, FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry Lahore and Pakistan Council for Science and Industrial Research Lahore. All impression samples which fall under the inclusion criteria in the Department of Prosthodontics, FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry Lahore and Pakistan Council for Science and Industrial Research Lahore were included. Samples were divided into two groups, i.e., Group 1 (single-step technique) & Group 2 (two-step technique). The impression's longitudinal length and inter-line distance were measured to assess the outcome i-e linear dimensional accuracy.

Result:

A total of 60 impression samples with polyvinyl siloxane impressions material were made. The linear dimensional accuracy in one step & two-step impression technique was seen in 5 (8.33%) & 13(21.66%) samples, respectively, (p=0.011).

Conclusion:

Compared to the one-step impression technique, the higher linear dimensional accuracy of the two-step impression technique uses polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Khuda-E- Dad, Dentistry

Registrar,
FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

Nazia Yazdanie, FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

Professor,
FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

Shafqat Hussain, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar

Assistant Professor,
Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar

Mohammad Waqas, FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

Registrar,
FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

KAPIL KUMAR, FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore 

Junior Registrar / Demonstrator,
FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore 

Haider Amin Malik, FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

Demonstrator,
Department of Prosthodontics,
FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore

References

Naumovski B, Kapushevska B. Dimensional Stability and Accuracy of Silicone – Based Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques – A Literature Review. PRILOZI. 2017 Sep 1;38(2):131–8

Aggarwal R, Jain S, Choudhary S, Reddy NK, Garg S. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2019;20(8):928–34

Sayed ME, Al-Makramani BMA, Al-Sanabani FA, Mohamed MS. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2016;17(9):734–9

Kumari N, Nandeeshwar DB. The dimensional accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using two different impression techniques: An in vitro study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2015///Jul-Sep;15(3):211–7

Franco EB, da Cunha LF, Herrera FS, Benetti AR. Accuracy of Single-Step versus 2-Step Double-Mix Impression Technique. ISRN dentistry. 2011;2011:341546–341546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/341546

Kumari J. Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly formulated vinyl polysiloxanether impression material with two different conventional elastomeric impression materials using two different impression techniques after disinfection- An in vitro study. MedPulse International Journal of Dentistry. 2019;11(3):12–8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26611/10191131

Jamshidy L, Mozaffari HR, Faraji P, Sharifi R. Accuracy of the One-Stage and Two-Stage Impression Techniques: A Comparative Analysis. International journal of dentistry. 2016;2016:7256496–7256496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7256496

Reza Rezaie H, Beigi Rizi H, Rezaei Khamseh MM, Öchsner A. A Review on Dental Materials [Internet]. Advanced Structured Materials. Springer International Publishing; 2020. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48931-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48931-1

Sayed ME, Al-Makramani BMA, Al-Sanabani FA, Mohamed MS. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2016;17(9):734–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1921

Kumari N, Nandeeshwar DB. The dimensional accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using two different impression techniques: An in vitro study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2015///Jul-Sep;15(3):211–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.158074

Naumovski B, Kapushevska B. Dimensional Stability and Accuracy of Silicone – Based Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques – A Literature Review. PRILOZI. 2017 Sep 1;38(2):131–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2017-0031

Pandey A, Mathema SRB, Maharjan SK. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Cast Obtained from Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression with Different Putty-Wash Techniques and Spacer Thickness - In Vitro Study. Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society. 2018 Dec 31;1(2):67–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jnprossoc.v1i2.23859

Aggarwal R, Jain S, Choudhary S, Reddy NK, Garg S. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2019;20(8):928–34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2629

Xu Y, Unkovskiy A, Klaue F, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Spintzyk S. Compatibility of a Silicone Impression/Adhesive System to FDM-Printed Tray Materials-A Laboratory Peel-off Study. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2018 Oct 7;11(10):1905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101905

Zarrintaj P, Rezaei S, Jafari SH, Saeb MR, Ghalami S, Roshandel M, et al. Impression materials for dental prosthesis [Internet]. Advanced Dental Biomaterials. Elsevier; 2019. p. 197–215. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102476-8.00009-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102476-8.00009-8

Saeed F, Muhammad N, Khan AS, Sharif F, Rahim A, Ahmad P, et al. Prosthodontics dental materials: From conventional to unconventional. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2020 Jan;106:110167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110167

Rudolph H, Graf MRS, Kuhn K, Rupf-Köhler S, Eirich A, Edelmann C, et al. Performance of dental impression materials: Benchmarking of materials and techniques by three-dimensional analysis. Dental Materials Journal. 2015;34(5):572–84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-197

Ahmed M, Chakmakchi M. An in Vitro Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Addition Silicone and Polyether Impression Materials after Different Pouring Time. Al-Rafidain Dental Journal. 2016 Jun 1;16(1):10–8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33899/rden.2016.160862

Downloads

Published

2022-07-01

How to Cite

Dad, K.-E.-. ., Yazdanie, N., Hussain, S. ., Waqas, M. ., KUMAR, K., & Malik, H. A. (2022). Comparison of Linear Dimensional Accuracy Between One Step and Two-step Impression Technique Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material. Journal of Gandhara Medical and Dental Science, 9(3), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.9-3.134