Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive General Surgery A Retrospective Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-3.490Keywords:
Minimally Invasive General Surgery, MIGS, HMC Hospital Peshawar, OutcomesAbstract
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive general surgery (MIGS) and determine the indications for MIGS and its success rate.
METHODS
This retrospective study was conducted at the surgery unit of Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC) Hospital, Peshawar, from January 2021 to December 2022. All the 200 patients who underwent MIGS were included in the study. Data regarding demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, type of MIGS, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were collected from the medical records and analyzed. The outcome of the study was assessed based on the success rate of the MIGS procedure and the occurrence of any postoperative complications.
RESULTS
The mean age of the patients was 43.3 years (range 10–75 years). The most common indication for MIGS was cholecystectomy (33.5%). Other indications included appendectomy (17.5%), hernia repair (12%), small bowel resection (10%), and gastrectomy (7%). The overall success rate of MIGS was 97.5%. The most common postoperative complication was wound infection (6.5%). There were no deaths due to MIGS.
CONCLUSION
The study findings suggest that MIGS is a safe and effective procedure for managing various surgical diseases and can be performed with minimal morbidity and mortality. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of MIGS in different settings.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Wright DB, Koh CE, Solomon MJ. Systematic review of the feasibility of laparoscopic reoperation for early postoperative complications following colorectal surgery. Journal of British Surgery. 2017 Mar;104(4):337-46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10469
Arnold M, Elhage S, Schiffern L, Paton L, Ross SW, Matthews BD, Reinke CE. Use of minimally invasive surgery in emergency general surgery procedures. Surgical Endoscopy. 2019 Aug 6;34(5):2258-65
Van Dijk ST, Bos K, de Boer MGJ, Draaisma WA, van Enst WA, Felt RJF, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient treatment for acute diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:505–12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3015-9
Beyer Berjot L, Maggiori L, Loiseau D, de Korwin JD, Bongiovanni JP, Lesprit P, et al. Emergency surgery in acute diverticulitis: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:397–405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001327
Pucher PH, Mackenzie H, Tucker V, Mercer SJ. A national propensity score-matched analysis of emergency laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2021;108:934–40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab048
Donohue SJ, Reinke CE, Evans SL, Jordan MM, Warren YE, Hetherington T, et al. Laparoscopy is associated with decreased all-cause mortality in patients undergoing emergency general surgery procedures in a regional health system. Surg Endosc. 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08699-1
Turley RS, Barbas AS, Lidsky ME, Mantyh CR, Migaly J, Scarborough JE. Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis. Dis Colon Rectum.2013;56:72–82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182749cf5
Forte DM, Sheldon R, Johnson E, Steele SR, Martin MJ. Big colon surgery, little incisions: minimally invasive techniques in emergent colon surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89:E1 6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002616
Ahmed SE, Jha A, Norman S, Jha M, Garg D. Role and outcome of laparoscopic/minimally invasive surgery for a variety of colorectal emergencies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2020;30:451–3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000812
Catena F, Moore EE. World Journal of Emergency Surgery (WJES), World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the role of emergency surgery in the world. World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2:3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-2-3
Tariq S, Bashir A, Ashraf M, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive general surgery in a tertiary care hospital. J Surg Pak. 2016;21(2):74-77
Chari RS, Chari A, Chari S. Minimally invasive general surgery: an overview. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(10)
Tanawuttiwat T, Charuluxananan S. A review of minimally invasive general surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(45):5701-5708
Meidert AS, Saugel B. Techniques for non-invasive monitoring of arterial blood pressure. Frontiers in medicine. 2018 Jan 8;4:231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00231
Bhardwaj A, Gulati MS, Bhatia A, Tyagi A, Mittal S. Minimally Invasive General Surgery: A Review. Indian J Surg. 2019;81(5):547-55
Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Pisarska M, Major P, Wysocki M, Stefura T, Budzyński A. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2017 Aug;402:841-51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1583-8
Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Baijal M. Laparoscopic Surgery: What a Surgeon Should Know. Indian J Surg. 2009;71(6):400-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-009-0066-8
Arnold M, Elhage S, Schiffern L, Lauren Paton B, Ross SW, Matthews BD, Reinke CE. Use of minimally invasive surgery in emergency general surgery procedures. Surgical Endoscopy. 2020 May;34:2258-65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07016-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Shah, Muhammad Iftikhar, Jamshed Alam, Rashid Aslam, Shimee Shahzadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
