Diagnostic Accuracy of the Modified CT Severity Index for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Using the Revised Atlanta Classification as Reference Standard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.13-4.960Keywords:
Acute Pancreatitis, Computed Tomography Severity Index, diagnostic accuracy, Modified CTSI, Revised Atlanta Classification, Severe Acute PancreatitisAbstract
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index (mCTSI) for identifying severe acute pancreatitis using the Revised Atlanta Classification as the reference standard.
METHODOLOGY
This cross-sectional validation study included 155 adults aged 20–60 years with acute pancreatitis who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography at Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, from 22 February to 22 May 2025. mCTSI was calculated from computed tomography performed after 48 hours of admission, while severe disease, by Revised Atlanta Classification, was defined by persistent organ failure for more than 48 hours using the Modified Marshall score. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using a 2×2 table and reported as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and overall accuracy.
RESULTS
Mean age was 42.8 ± 11.6 years, and 94 (60.6%) patients were male. Severe acute pancreatitis was classified in 46 (29.7%) patients by mCTSI and in 41 (26.5%) by Revised Atlanta criteria. There were 37 true-positive, 105 true-negative, nine false-positive, and four false-negative results. mCTSI demonstrated sensitivity of 90.2%, specificity of 92.1%, positive predictive value of 80.4%, negative predictive value of 96.3%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.6%. Performance remained broadly consistent across age, sex, and symptom-duration strata.
CONCLUSION
CTSI showed high diagnostic accuracy for severe acute pancreatitis compared with the Revised Atlanta Classification. Its high negative predictive value supports its usefulness for radiological risk stratification when interpreted alongside clinical assessment and serial organ-failure evaluation and may support timely escalation of monitoring and supportive clinical care decisions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Szatmary P, Grammatikopoulos T, Cai W, Huang W, Mukherjee R, Halloran C, et al. Acute pancreatitis: diagnosis and treatment. Drugs. 2022;82(12):1251-1276. doi:10.1007/s40265-022-01766-4. PMID: 36074322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-022-01766-4
Chatterjee R, Parab N, Sajjan B, Nagar VS. Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(2):99-103. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23343. PMID: 32205940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23343
Zheng Z, Ding YX, Qu YX, Cao F, Li F. A narrative review of the mechanism of acute pancreatitis and recent advances in its clinical management. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(3):833-852. PMID: 33841625
Jiang X, Zheng YW, Bao S, Zhang H, Chen R, Yao Q, et al. Drug discovery and formulation development for acute pancreatitis. Drug Deliv. 2020;27(1):1562-1580. doi:10.1080/10717544.2020.1840665. PMID: 33118404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2020.1840665
Walkowska J, Zielinska N, Tubbs RS, Podgórski M, Dłubek-Ruxer J, Olewnik Ł. Diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(8):1974. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12081974. PMID: 36010324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081974
Zheng Z, Ding YX, Qu YX, Cao F, Li F. A narrative review of acute pancreatitis and its diagnosis, pathogenetic mechanism, and management. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(1):69. doi:10.21037/atm-20-4802. PMID: 33553362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4802
Han X, Hu MN, Ji P, Liu YF. Construction and validation of a severity prediction model for acute pancreatitis based on CT severity index: a retrospective case-control study. PLoS One. 2024;19(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0303684. PMID: 38787912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303684
Manoj M, Sandhu MS, Gupta P, Samanta J, Sharma V, Kumar V, et al. Impact of contrast-enhanced versus non-contrast computed tomography on acute kidney injury in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023;42(6):808-817. doi:10.1007/s12664-023-01415-y. PMID: 37578599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-023-01415-y
Yan X, Lv K, Xiao M, Tan L, Gui Y, Zhang J, et al. The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Cancer Res. 2022;11(10):3645-3656. doi:10.21037/tcr-22-601. PMID: 36388042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-601
Yang J, Huang J, Zhang Y, Zeng K, Liao M, Jiang Z, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for differentiating mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2023;136(17):2028-2036. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000002300. PMID: 36728948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002300
Yamamoto T, Horibe M, Sanui M, Sasaki M, Mizobata Y, Esaki M, et al. Early detection of necrosis in low-enhanced pancreatic parenchyma using contrast-enhanced computed tomography was a better predictor of clinical outcomes than pancreatic inflammation: a multicentric cohort study of severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2024;24(6):827-833. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2024.07.001. PMID: 38991872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.07.001
Apisarnthanarak P, Boonsri P, Suvannarerg V, Chaiyasoot W, Pongprasobchai S, Apisarnthanarak A. Comparison of CT Severity Index and Modified CT Severity Index in the clinical severity assessment of acute pancreatitis. J Health Sci Med Res. 2022;40(4):425-435. doi:10.31584/jhsmr.2021854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2021854
Khattak MB, Khan RSA, Khan RZA, Din RU, Shabbir K, Karim R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis and Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index in determining the severity of acute pancreatitis using Revised Atlanta Classification as the gold standard. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2023;73(3):933-937. doi:10.51253/pafmj.v73i3.9430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i3.9430
Sahu B, Abbey P, Anand R, Kumar A, Tomer S, Malik E. Severity assessment of acute pancreatitis using CT severity index and modified CT severity index: correlation with clinical outcomes and severity grading as per the Revised Atlanta Classification. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2017;27(2):152-160. doi:10.4103/ijri.IJRI_300_16. PMID: 28744075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_300_16
Kumar AH, Griwan MS. A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018;6(2):127-131. doi:10.1093/gastro/gox029. PMID: 29780601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gox029
Padu G, Lal P, Vindal A. Comparison of Modified Atlanta Classification with Modified CT Severity Index in acute gallstone pancreatitis. MAMC J Med Sci. 2019;5(2):63-68. doi:10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_13_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_13_19
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102-111. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. PMID: 23100216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779
Zaidi M, Ali M, Ahmed S, Khan F. Diagnostic accuracy of modified CT severity index in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. J Bahria Univ Med Dent Coll. 2025;15(1):27-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51985/JBUMDC2025598
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syeda Najia Hussain, Anisa Kalsoom, Mashal Tanveer Raja, Faryal Asmat, Syed Ahmad Ali Husnain Naqvi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















