Comparison of Functional and Morphological Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.13-4.879Keywords:
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction, Pyeloplasty, Laparoscopy, Infant, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, HydronephrosisAbstract
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the study was to compare functional, morphological, perioperative, and short-term surgical outcomes of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
METHODOLOGY
This prospective quasi-experimental study enrolled 116 infants aged 12 months or younger at Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, between June and November 2025, with six-month postoperative follow-up. Fifty-eight infants underwent open Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty and 58 underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty; allocation was based on surgeon expertise and parental preference. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal pelvic anteroposterior diameter, and renal parenchymal thickness were assessed before surgery and at six months. Operative time, hospital stay, complications, and surgical success were also compared.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics and preoperative eGFR were comparable between groups. At six months, mean eGFR increased by 5.3 mL/min/1.73 m² after open pyeloplasty and 6.1 mL/min/1.73 m² after laparoscopic pyeloplasty (p=0.016). Reduction in anteroposterior diameter was greater after laparoscopy (18.4±3.1 vs 15.8±2.9 mm; p<0.0001), as was improvement in parenchymal thickness (4.0±0.7 vs 3.0±0.7 mm; p=0.001). Laparoscopy required longer operative time (165±25 vs 90±12 minutes; p=0.001) but shorter hospitalisation (5.0±1.5 vs 6.5±2.0 days; p=0.002). Surgical success was similar (94.8% vs 93.1%; p=0.65), with low complication rates.
CONCLUSION
Both approaches produced high success and acceptable morbidity. Laparoscopy showed modestly greater functional and morphological improvement and shorter hospitalisation, but the non-randomised design limits causal interpretation. eGFR was calculated with age-appropriate creatinine-based equations, ultrasound was interpreted by a radiologist blinded to surgical approach, and complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Longer follow-up is required to determine whether these differences persist in this infant population.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Costigan CS, Rosenblum ND. Understanding ureteropelvic junction obstruction: how far have we come? Front Urol. 2023;3:1154740. doi:10.3389/fruro.2023.1154740. PMID: 40778044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1154740
Hodhod A, Fermin-Risso C, Farhad M, Cook AJ, Aburezq J, Eid H, et al. Can we improve the usefulness of the diuretic renogram in the diagnosis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children? Introduction of mercaptoacetyltriglycine-suspected obstruction scoring system (MAG-SOS). J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(3):311.e1-311.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.02.022. PMID: 36922332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.02.022
Cascini V, Lauriti G, Di Renzo D, Miscia ME, Lisi G. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: open or minimally invasive surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:1052440. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.1052440. PMID: 36507128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1052440
Wang M, Xi Y, Huang N, Wang P, Zhang L, Zhao M, et al. Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2023;11. doi:10.7717/peerj.16468. PMID: 38025670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16468
Ortiz-Seller D, Panach-Navarrete J, Valls-González L, Martínez-Jabaloyas JM. Comparison between open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2024;20(2):244-252. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.11.017. PMID: 38065760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.11.017
Andolfi C, Lombardo AM, Aizen J, Recabal X, Walker JP, Barashi NS, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves. World J Urol. 2022;40(4):1049-1056. doi:10.1007/s00345-022-03929-0. PMID: 35044490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03929-0
Esposito C, Cerulo M, Lepore B, Coppola V, D'Auria D, Esposito G, et al. Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(4):1239-1246. doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1. PMID: 36913057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1
Langreen S, Ludwikowski B, Dingemann J, Ure BM, Hofmann AD, Kuebler JF. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in neonates and infants is safe and efficient. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1397614. doi:10.3389/fped.2024.1397614. PMID: 39132308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1397614
Gao J, Zhang S, Wang L, Wang X. Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants under 6 months. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):13737. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99115-4. PMID: 40259103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99115-4
Ibrahim RB, Srivaths P, Tam E, Devaraj S. Utility of cystatin C-based equation for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a pediatric population. J Appl Lab Med. 2024;9(4):803-808. doi:10.1093/jalm/jfae034. PMID: 38656545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae034
Chu H, Deng Q, Cao Y, Yu X. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and transumbilical incision open pyeloplasty for treatment of infants with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a clinical efficacy and safety study. Transl Pediatr. 2025;14(2):231-239. doi:10.21037/tp-2024-503. PMID: 40115454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-2024-503
Christanto RBI, Raharja PAR, Situmorang GR, Wahyudi I, Rodjani A, Imam A, et al. Long-term renal function post-pyeloplasty: a systematic review. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025;57(10):3107-3115. doi:10.1007/s11255-025-04495-1. PMID: 40205125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04495-1
Shi T, Lao W, Ouyang K, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Luo J, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for newborns with severe hydronephrosis. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1343211. doi:10.3389/fped.2024.1343211. PMID: 38560400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1343211
Tharanendran H, Sundararajan L, Babu R, Arunachalam P. Does age influence the functional recovery after infant pyeloplasty? J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024;29(3):219-222. doi:10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_194_23. PMID: 38912019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_194_23
Siregar S, Mustafa A, Steven S. Can we predict renal function recovery after pyeloplasty in pediatrics with ureteropelvic junction obstruction? A systematic review. Urol Res Pract. 2024;50(2):85-93. doi:10.5152/tud.2024.23220. PMID: 38798006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2024.23220
Hodhod A, Eid H, Fermin-Risso C, Farhad M, Aburezq J, Cook A, et al. Significant improvement in hydronephrosis with pyeloplasty prior to 3 months of age in patients with antenatal severe hydronephrosis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024;56(8):2467-2473. doi:10.1007/s11255-024-04002-y. PMID: 38507157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04002-y
Zhang X, Zhao Y, Tao T, Cao H, Yi X, Zhou X, et al. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2025;60(12):162561. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162561. PMID: 40818802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162561
González ST, Rosito TE, Bujons Tur A, Ruiz J, Gozalbez R, Maiolo A, et al. Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(6):961-968. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0194. PMID: 36083265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0194
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Younas khan, Tariq Ahmad, Murad Ali, Asghar Ali, Abdul Basit Shah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















