Midterm Follow-Up Of Tlif In Single-Level Lumbar Disc Degeneration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.11-4.620Keywords:
Lumber Disc, Postoperative Pain, Fusion, SurgicalAbstract
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to evaluate the midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of TLIF in patients with single-level lumbar disc degeneration. The focus is on assessing the procedure's effectiveness in terms of pain relief, functional improvement, and any potential complications.
METHODOLOGY
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar involving 120 patients who underwent single-level TLIF for lumbar disc degeneration between 2018-2023. The patients with a diagnosis of single-level lumbar disc degeneration confirmed by MRI, failure of conservative treatment for at least 6 months, and who underwent TLIF during the study period were included in the study. Data were collected on preoperative and postoperative pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and radiological parameters. SPSS version 24 was used.
RESULTS
The mean follow-up period was 36 months (range 24-48 months). There was a statistically significant improvement in both pain scores (p < 0.001) and ODI scores (p < 0.001). Fusion rates were high, with 92% of patients achieving solid fusion by the final follow-up. Complications were observed in 15% of the cases, with adjacent segment disease being the most common.
CONCLUSION
TLIF provides significant pain relief and functional improvement in patients with single-level lumbar disc degeneration at midterm follow-up. The procedure demonstrates a high fusion rate with an acceptable complication profile, making it a reliable option for this patient population
Downloads
Metrics
References
Harrop JS, Sharan A, Anderson G, et al. Lumbar fusion outcomes: a study of 1,030 patients. Spine J. 2018;18(1):56-65
Levin DA, Hale JJ, Bendo JA. Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2016;74(2):76-81
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, pearls, and pitfalls. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):37-43
Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(17):1938-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03
Kim JS, Jung B, Lee SH. Instrumented minimally invasive spinal-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): minimum 5-year follow-up with clinical and radiologic outcomes. Clinical spine surgery. 2018 Jul 1;31(6):E302-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd
Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O'Brien MF, Smith DA. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2002 Feb 1;15(1):31-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200202000-00005
Kim SB, Jeon TS, Heo YM, Lee WS, Yi JW, Kim TK, Hwang CM. Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment. Clinics in orthopedic surgery. 2009 Dec 1;1(4):207-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2009.1.4.207
Penta M, Yu W, Boakye M. The outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2016;27(1):35-42
Miller LE, Bhattacharyya S, Pracyk J. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;133:358-65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.162
Ravindra VM, Senglaub SS, Rattner M, et al. Current trends in lumbar spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(17):676-83
Schlegel JD, Sasso RC, Hanson D. Multilevel lumbar fusion: A prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(15):1897-1901
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, et al. Spinal deformity surgery outcomes in adults. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(4):356-364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12335
Steiger HJ, Börm W. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, indications, and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(3):510-520
Takahashi K, Kawahara N, Tomita K. Impact of lumbar lordosis restoration on clinical outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Spine J. 2017;17(5):610-618
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, et al. Perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes in lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;44(5)
Wang JC, Mummaneni PV, Haid RW. Current treatment strategies for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Spine J. 2012;12(7):603-610
Wilke HJ, Heuer F, Neidlinger-Wilke C. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion devices. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2017;22(1):45-52
Zhao X, Fan SW, Zhao FD, Fang XQ, Fang X. Comparison of lumbar interbody fusion techniques in terms of surgical outcomes and complications: a meta-analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2018;31(2)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdul Satar, Samir Khan Kabir, Muhammad Zahid Khan, Muhammad Arif Khan, Waqar Khan, Muhammad Anwaar Ul Haq, Mazhar Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
