Comparison of Vicryl Versus Prolene Suture in Closure of Midline Rectus Sheath Following Elective Laparotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.13-2.821Keywords:
Prolene, , Vicryl, Midline Laparotomy, Wound Dehiscence, surgical site infection, stoma closure, ileostomy, colostomyAbstract
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES
This aimed to compare the incidence of wound dehiscence and surgical site infections following midline rectus sheath closure with Prolene and Vicryl sutures after laparotomy.
METHODOLOGY
This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, over 6 months. A total of 152 patients (aged 18–70 years) undergoing elective midline laparotomy were randomly divided into two groups using simple randomization by coin-flip method: Group A (Prolene) and Group B (Vicryl), each consisting of 76 patients. Both groups underwent standardized continuous mass closure with a 4:1 suture-to-wound length ratio. Post-operative follow-up continued for 30 days at post-operative days 7, 14, and 30, to assess wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and hospital stay. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.
RESULTS
Wound dehiscence occurred in 4 (5.3%) patients in the Prolene group compared with 10 (13.2%) in the Vicryl group (p<0.05). Surgical site infections were also significantly lower in the Prolene group 11 (14.4%) compared to the Vicryl 25 (32.9%) (p< 0.05). The hospital stay was slightly longer in the Vicryl group (7±2 vs 5±2), which was mainly due to post-operative complications (p< 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Closure of the midline rectus sheath with Prolene results in significantly fewer cases of wound dehiscence and surgical site infections compared to Vicryl. Prolene may be considered a favorable option for midline laparotomy closure to minimize post-operative complications and improve patient outcomes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Kunju RD, Thakkannavar V, SM K, SH G, Netto A, JS J, et al. A clinical study of continuous and interrupted fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy at a tertiary care centre. Int Surg J. 2017;4(6):2014-2017. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20172403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20172403
Frassini S, Cobianchi L, Fugazzola P, Biffl WL, Coccolini F, Damaskos D, et al. ECLAPTE: effective closure of laparotomy in emergency—2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00511-w PMID: 37401729 PMCID: PMC10311589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00511-w
Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):CD005661. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005661 PMID: 29125671 PMCID: PMC6486226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2
Lakshmi G, Ravimohan TR. Post laparotomy abdominal wound dehiscence – a study in tertiary care hospital. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2018;5(11). https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2018.5.11.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2018.5.11.8
Rahman UA, Iftikhar MA, Miraj MZU, Butt MJ, Ahmed I, Yousaf H. Incidence of wound dehiscence and factors causing wound dehiscence in patients undergoing laparotomy in a newly established surgery department at a tertiary care hospital. Prof Med J. 2023;30(10):1225-1229. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2023.30.10.7710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2023.30.10.7710
Alam I, Amin S, Iqbal S, Samad M, Tahir R. Frequency of wound dehiscence in adults undergoing midline exploratory laparotomy in a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar. Northwest J Med Sci. 2025;4(3). https://doi.org/10.69723/njms.04.03.0595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69723/njms.04.03.0595
Akbar F, Khan M, Ahmad N, Abbas S, Khan N. Comparison of laparotomy wound dehiscence rate using interrupted X-suture technique vs continuous suture technique in rectus sheath in emergency laparotomy. J Saidu Med Coll Swat. 2021;11(3):133-136. https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2021.11.3.646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2021.11.3.646
Walming S, Angenete E, Block M, Bock D, Gessler B, Haglind E. Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0 PMID: 28187748 PMCID: PMC5305063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0
Helgeland J, Tomic O, Hansen TM, Kristoffersen DT, Hassani S, Lindahl AK. Post-operative wound dehiscence after laparotomy: a useful healthcare quality indicator? A cohort study based on Norwegian hospital administrative data. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e026422. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026422 PMID: 30944135 PMCID: PMC6463013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026422
Huang Q, Li J, Lau WY. Techniques for abdominal wall closure after damage control laparotomy: from temporary abdominal closure to early/delayed fascial closure – a review. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:2073260. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2073260 PMID: 27066049 PMCID: PMC4790672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2073260
Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):843-856. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4 PMID: 20395847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4
Fortelny RH. Abdominal wall closure in elective midline laparotomy: the current recommendations. Front Surg. 2018;5:34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00034 PMID: 29946305 PMCID: PMC6006123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00034
Pandey S, Singh M, Singh K, Sandhu S. A prospective randomized study comparing non-absorbable polypropylene (Prolene®) and delayed absorbable polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®) suture material in mass closure of vertical laparotomy wounds. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(4):306-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0492-x PMID: 24426464 PMCID: PMC3684341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0492-x
World Medical Association. WMA declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA; 2013. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/
Zahra S, Waris H, Khan BI, Zafar MH, Shahram H, Shafiq MH. Post-operative surgical site infection rates after elective vs emergency laparotomy: an audit. Biol Clin Sci Res J. 2025;6(8):67-70. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i8.1957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i8.1957
Prakash P, Jaiswal S, Srivastava VK, Srivastava N. Evaluation of surgical site infection rates in emergency vs elective laparotomy: a cross-sectional analysis in a tertiary care center. J Contemp Clin Pract. 2025;11:546-550
Bath MF, Powell J, Ismail I, Machesney MR. Use of pulsed lavage reduces the rate of surgical site infection after laparotomy. J Surg Res. 2021;266:300-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.022 PMID: 34043968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.019
Boyd-Carson H. The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit: impact for general surgical training and service provision. Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2020
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sabin Rauf, Gohar Ali, Musarrat Hussain, Unsia Fatima; Aqib Ali Khan; Sana Rasheed, Muhammad Bilal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
