Single Layer Extra-Mucosal Interrupted Anastomoses; Revalidated
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.2-1.59Keywords:
Anastomosis, extra-mucosal, single layer and leakageAbstract
Objective:
To evaluate the safety regarding anastomotic failure of single layer interrupted extra mucosal intestinal anastomosis in comparison with double layer intestinal anastomosis
Methodology:
This prospective comparative study was conducted in surgical A unit of Lady reading Hospital Peshawar from 1st June 2007 to 1st February 2008 (8 months).Patients were divided into two groups, each comprising 60 patients. First 60 consecutive patients were included in Group A, for single layer extra mucosal anastomosis while Group B included last 60 consecutive patients for double layer inverting anastomosis (continuous inner and interrupted outer Lambert sutures). All the cases were admitted through OPD and emergency. The safety of two techniques of anastomosis was analyzed by comparing the outcome in terms of complications.
Results:
In this study, anastomosis leakage occurred only in 4 (3.33%) patients, one (1.67%) in group A and three (5%) in group B with a P-Value 0.138. Mean age of patient in group A was 36.15 years (+/- 6.0 years) and in group B was 33.25 years (+/- 5.5 years).
Conclusion:
Single layer extra-mucosal anastomosis has least anastomotic leakage and other complication like wound infection, septicemia, and collection and burst abdomen than in patients with double layer investing anastomosis.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ayub M, sheikh R, Gangat S, Iqbal A, Single layer anastomosis versis two layer anastomosis. A prospective study. Pak J Surg. 2011;25(3):277-80
Sajid SM, Rafi SM, Siddiqui S, Baig M. Single layer anastomosis verses double layer suture anastomosis of GI tract. Cochrane colorectal cancer group:Jan 2012;34(4):154-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005477.pub4
Nyhus LM, Baker RJ (eds) Mastery of surgery. Vol 2nd ed. Chicago:1992; 1151-61
Ashkanani F, Krukowshi ZH, Intestinal anastomosis.Surgery international 2002, 57:104-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1383/surg.20.5.104.14630
Tarar NA, Evaluation of extra mucosal single layer intestinal anastomosis technique : Pak Armed Forces Med J: Dec 2003; 53(2)- 124-5
Egorov VI, Schastlivtsev V, Turusov RA, Baranov AO. Participation of intestinal layers in supplying of the mechnical strength of intact and sutured gut. EurSurg Res 2002;34:425-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000065712
Egorov VI, Schastlivtsev IV, Prut EV, Baranov AO, Turusov RA. Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. J Biomech 2002;35:1417-25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00084-2
Samiullah, Israr M, Zada N. Comparison of single layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis with double layer intestinal anastomosis. J Postgrad Med Inst 2003; 17:263–6
Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE, Biffi WL, Offner PJ. Single layer continuous versus two layers interrupted intestinal anastomosis; a prospective randomized trail. Ann Surg 2000;231:832-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200006000-00007
Sandrasegan K, Dean D, John C, Thomas J. Samll bowl complication of major gastrointestinal tract surgery. Am J Roentol:2005;185(3)-671-81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850671
Bruse J, Krukowski EM, Park KGM. Systemic review of the definition and measurement anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1157-68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x
Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu RJ, Stein HD. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomosis. J Am Collsurg 1997; 184(4):364-72. September 2015- March 2016 26
Leslie A, Steele RJ. The interrupted serosubmucosal anastomosis-still the gold standard. Colorectal Dis 2003;5(4):362-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00460.x
Ordirica-Flares RM, Bracho-Blanchet E, Nieto-zermeno J, Reyes-Retana R, Tovilla-Mercado JM et al. intestinal anastomosis in children: a comparative study between two techniques. J pediatrSurg 1998;33:1757-59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90279-2
Ishida H, Yokoyama M, Nakada H, Inokuma S, Hashimoto D. Impact of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis on surgical site infection and methicillin- resistant. Staphylococcus aureus infection in elective colorectal surgery; results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery today 2001;31:979-83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950170006
Matheson NA. Prospective audit of an extramucosal technique for intestinal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1992;79:84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800790848
Khan N, Rahman A, Sadiq MD. Single layer interrupted serosubmucosal (extramucosal) intestinal anastomosis. J Med Sci 2006:14:10-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Bilal Khattak, Dr., Faiz -Ur- Rahman, Dr., Irfan -Ul-Islam Nasir, Dr., Muhammad Iftikhar, Dr., Imtiaz Ahmad Khattak, Dr., Zia -Ur- Rehman, Dr.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
