Histopathological Assessment of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection Specimens and its Correlation with Tumor Size and Grade

Authors

  • Zara madiha Multan Medical and Dental College, Multan
  • Shahila Jalil Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore
  • Saroash Iqbal Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore
  • Zainab Jamil Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore
  • Saniyah Ali Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore
  • Sara Sadiq Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore
  • Fariha Sahrish Azra Naheed Medical College, Superior University, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-4.473

Keywords:

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Microvascular Invasion, Anatomical Liver resection

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the histopathological assessment of microvascular invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection Specimens and its correlation with tumour size and grade.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective cross-sectional study included the biopsy-proven Hepatocellular (HCC) case with microvascular invasion (MVI) noted in the resected specimens evaluated by two independent consultants Histopathologists. The exclusion criteria were; all patients below 18 years, unfixed autolyzed samples, and incomplete requisition-filled forms. Numerical data, i.e., patient age and tumour size, are presented as mean with standard deviation. Categorical variables, i.e., tumour size, grade, and presence or absence of MVI, were submitted as numbers with percentages. Continuous variables, i.e., tumour size and differentiation grade, were assessed using the Chi-square test. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS
Most patients, 34.4%, fall into the age group of 47-70. Most patients were males, 63.6%, and microvascular invasion was noted in 49.09% of cases. Most cases were of moderate to poorly differentiated tumours, 80.0%. MVI was statistically significant with the grade of the tumour.

CONCLUSION

Microvascular invasion is an important prognostic marker noted in a surgical resection specimen. Although the exact definition and risk stratification is unclear, survival studies have proven that MVI is associated with poor outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Zara madiha, Multan Medical and Dental College, Multan

Senior Demontrator,
Multan Medical and Dental College, Multan

Shahila Jalil, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore

Associate Professor,
Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore

Saroash Iqbal, Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Senior Demonstrator,
Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Zainab Jamil, Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Senior Demonstrator,
Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Saniyah Ali, Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Senior Demonstrator,
Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Sara Sadiq, Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Senior Demonstrator,
Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore

Fariha Sahrish, Azra Naheed Medical College, Superior University, Lahore

Assistant Professor,
Azra Naheed Medical College, Superior University, Lahore

References

Zheng Z, Guan R, Jianxi W, Zhao Z, Peng T, Liu C, et al. Microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of its definition, clinical significance, and comprehensive management. J Onco. 2022 Mar 30;2022

Benson AB, D’Angelica MI, Abbott DE, Anaya DA, Anders R, Are C, et al. Hepatobiliary Cancers, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice Guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(5):541–65.

Zhou J, Sun H, Wang Z, Cong W, Wang J, Zeng M, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (2019 edition). Liver Cancer. 2020;9(6):682–720

Jung DH, Hwang S, Lee YJ, Kim KH, Song GW, Ahn CS. Small hepatocellular carcinoma with low tumour marker expression benefits more from anatomical resection than tumours with aggressive biology. Annals of Surgery. 2019;269(3):511–9.

Sheng X, Ji Y, Ren G-P, Lu C-L, Yun J-P, Chen L-H, et al. A standardized pathological proposal for evaluating microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study by LCPGC. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(6):1034–47

Chen Z-H, Zhang X-P, Feng J-K, Li L-Q, Zhang F, Hu Y-R, et al. Actual long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion: a multicenter study from China. Hepatol Int. 2021;15(3):642–50

Chen L, Chen S, Zhou Q, Cao Q, Dong Y, Feng S, et al. Microvascular invasion status and its survival impact in hepatocellular carcinoma depend on tissue sampling protocol. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(11):6747–57

Yang Y, Lin K, Liu L, Qian Y, Yang Y, Yuan S, et al. Impact of preoperative TACE on incidences of microvascular invasion and long-term post-hepatectomy survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A propensity score matching analysis. Cancer Med. 2021;10(6):2100–11

Erstad DJ, Tanabe KK. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(5):1474–93

Huang Y, Zhang Z, Zhou Y, Yang J, Hu K, Wang Z. Should we apply sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion after curative hepatectomy? Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:541–8.

Zhang X-P, Chai Z-T, Gao Y-Z, Chen Z-H, Wang K, Shi J, et al. Postoperative adjuvant sorafenib improves survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion after R0 liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(12):1687–96

Chen Z-H, Zhang X-P, Wang H, Chai Z-T, Sun J-X, Guo W-X, et al. Effect of microvascular invasion on the postoperative long-term prognosis of solitary small HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(8):935–44

Huang C, Zhu X-D, Ji Y, Ding G-Y, Shi G-M, Shen Y-H, et al. Microvascular invasion has limited clinical values in hepatocellular carcinoma patients at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages 0 or B. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):58

Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Heimbach et al. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):358–80

Lencioni R, de Baere T, Soulen MC, Rilling WS, Geschwind J-FH. Lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of efficacy and safety data: Lencioni et al. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):106-16

Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68(2):723-50.

Xu X, Zhang H-L, Liu Q-P, Sun S-W, Zhang J, Zhu F-P, et al. Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;70(6):1133–44

Lee S, Kang TW, Song KD, Lee MW, Rhim H, Lim HK, et al. Effect of microvascular invasion risk on early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery and radiofrequency ablation. Ann Surg. 2021;273(3):564-71

Yau T, Tang VYF, Yao T-J, Fan S-T, Lo C-M, Poon RTP. Development of Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system with treatment stratification for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(7):1691-700.e3

Lei Z, Li J, Wu D, Xia Y, Wang Q, Si A. Nomogram for preoperative estimation of microvascular invasion risk in hepatitisvirus-related hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. JAMA surgery. 2016;151(4):356–63

Zhao H, Chen C, Fu X, Yan X, Jia W, Mao L, et al. Prognostic value of a novel risk classification of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. Oncotarget. 2017;8(3):5474-86

Feng L-H, Dong H, Lau W-Y, Yu H, Zhu Y-Y, Zhao Y, et al. Novel microvascular invasion-based prognostic nomograms to predict survival outcomes in patients after R0 resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(2):293–303

Zhang X, Li J, Shen F, Lau WY. Significance of presence of microvascular invasion in specimens obtained after surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Significance of microvascular invasion. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(2):347–54

Zhao J, Li X, Zhang K, Yin X, Meng X, Han L, et al. Prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma with preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging: A comparison of mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(33):e7754

Sun JJ, Wang K, Zhang CZ, Guo WX, Shi J, Cong WM, et al. Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after R0 hepatectomy improves outcomes of patients who have hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1344–51

Li C, Wang M-D, Lu L, Wu H, Yu J-J, Zhang W-G, et al. Preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for surgical resection of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ 10 cm): a multicenter propensity matching analysis. Hepatol Int. 2019;13(6):736-47

Wang L, Chen B, Li Z, Yao X, Liu M, Rong W, et al. Optimal postoperative adjuvant treatment strategy for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: a propensity score analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:1237-47

Ye J-Z, Chen J-Z, Li Z-H, Bai T, Chen J, Zhu S-L, et al. Efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(41):7415–24

Du M, Chen L, Zhao J, Tian F, Zeng H, Tan Y, et al. Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a poorer prognostic predictor for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):38

Lu X-Y, Xi T, Lau W-Y, Dong H, Xian Z-H, Yu H, et al. Pathobiological features of small hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between tumor size and biological behavior. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137(4):567-75

Downloads

Published

2023-10-01

How to Cite

madiha, Z., Jalil, S. ., Iqbal, S. ., Jamil, Z. ., Ali, S. ., Sadiq, S. ., & Sahrish, F. (2023). Histopathological Assessment of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection Specimens and its Correlation with Tumor Size and Grade. Journal of Gandhara Medical and Dental Science, 10(4), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-4.473

Most read articles by the same author(s)