To Determine the Decision to Delivery Interval in Category I Emergency Caesarean Sections in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Peshawar

Authors

  • Maimoona Qadir Khan Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar
  • Fauzia Afridi Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar
  • Mehjabina S.Ghayur Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-1.347

Keywords:

Antepartum Haemorrhage, Caesarean Section, Cephalopelvic Disproportion, Placental Abruption, Placenta Previa Obstructed Labor

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study is to determine the exact timing of the decision to the delivery interval in grade I caesarean sections, the factors contributing to the delays and the indications of those caesarean sections.

METHODOLOGY

This descriptive(cross-sectional) study is conducted in the Gynae B unit of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar from 1st April 2020 to 30th September 2020 over a span of 6 months. It is a consecutive non-purposive sampling. All women of any age or parity who underwent an emergency grade I caesarean section were included in the study. Age, gestational age, booking status, obstetrical history, the decision to delivery interval, an indication of caesarean, and mode of anesthesia was noted and entered in predesigned proforma.

RESULTS

114 patients underwent grade I caesarean in the study period.61(54%) were 21-30 years age group and 48(42%) were in the 31-40 years age group.26(23%) patients were not delayed.31(27%) got delayed as Operation Theatre table was not available,18(16%) could not arrange Caesarean medication and consumables in time,17(15%) could not provide preop investigations in time, in 13(11%) cases patient’s attendants were not available. Fetal distress was the most common cause (33%) of delayed caesarean sections, followed by previous scars in labour (20%), placenta previa with APH (13%), obstructed labour (12%), placental abruption and CPD in labour in 8% each. Spinal anaesthesia was given in 79% and General anaesthesia was given in 21% of cases.

CONCLUSION

26(23%) patients were not delayed and their decision to deliver interval was less than 30 minutes. The decision to the delivery interval in Khyber Teaching Hospital was far longer than recommended. The leading causes are delayed arrangement of the OT table, OT stuff and investigations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Maimoona Qadir Khan, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

Assistant Professor, Gynae B Unit,
Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

Fauzia Afridi, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

Assistant Professor Gynae B Unit,
Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

Mehjabina S.Ghayur, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

Assistant Professor Gynae B Unit,
Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

References

Shabila NP. Rates and trends in caesarean sections between 2008 and 2012 in Iraq. BMC Preg and Child 2017; 17(1): 22

Hirani BA, Mchome BL, Mazuguni NS, Mahande MJ. The decision to delivery interval in emergency cesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania:a cross sectional study. BMC Preg and Child 2017;17(4): 63- 68

Kitaw TM, Limenh SK, Chekole FA, Getie SA, Gemeda BN.Decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency caesarean section: a cross sectional study. BMC Preg and Child 2021; 1(2): 61- 68

Ayele AD, Kassa BG, Miheretie GN, Beyene FY. Decision to delivery interval,fetal outcomes and its factors among emergency caesarean section deliveries at South Gondar Zone Hospitals,Northwest Ethiopia: Retrospective cross sectional study.Intern J Women's Health 2021;13:395-403

Gupta S, Naithani U, Madhanmohan C, Singh A,Reddy P, Gupta A.Evaluation of decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean section: A 1 year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017;33:64-70

Oppong SA, Tuuli MG, Seffah JD, Adanu RMK. Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in Ghana?Results of analysis of early perinatal outcome.Ghana Med J 2014; 48(1): 24-30

Bello FA, Tsele TA, Oluwasola TO. Decision to delivery intervals and perinatal outcomes following emergency caesarean delivery in a Nigerian tertiary care hospital. Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 130(3): 279- 283

Chow KM, Mak SL. Maternal and fetal outcomes in extremely urgent caesarean delivery in relation to decision to delivery interval. Hong Kong J Obstet Gynaecol Midwifery 2015; 15(1): 16- 22

Wong TCT, Lau CQ, Tan EL, Kanagalingam D.Decision to delivery intervals and total duration of surgery for Caesarean sections in a tertiary general hospital. Singapore Med J 2017; 58(6): 332-337

Radhakrishanan G, Yadav G, Vaid NB,Ali H. Factors affecting decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections in atertiary care hospital: a cross sectional observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 2: 651- 656

Fayyaz S, Rafiq S, Hussain SS. Evaluation of decision to delivery interval and causes of delay in emergency caesarean sections in a tertiary care hospital. J Postgrad Med Inst 2015;29(4): 294- 296

Tashfeen K, Patel M, Hamdi IM, Al-Busaidi IHA. Decision to delivery time intervals in emergency caesarean sections: repeated cross sectional study fron Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2017; 17(1): 38- 42

Brandt JA, Morgenstern B, Thangarajah F. Evaluating the decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its impact on neonatal outcome. Inter J Anticancer Res 2020;34(6): 143-147

Temesgen MM, Gebregzi AH, Kasahun HG, Ahmed SA, Woldegerima YB. Evaluation of decision to delivery time an dits effect on fetomaternal outcomes an dassociated factors in category I emergency caesarean section deliveries: prospective cohort study. BMC Preg and Child 2020;20: 164

Kanario P, Mburugu P, Kabuga S.Decision to delivery interval of emergency caesarean sections and associated matewrnal and fetal outcomes in a country hospital in Kenya. East African Med J 2021; 98(7): 133-136

Melman S, Schreurs RHP, Dirksen CD, Kwee A, Nijhuis JG, Smeets NAC. Identification of barriers and facilitators for optimal caesarean section care: perspective of professionals. BMC Preg and Child 2017; 17(1): 230

Wong TCT, Lau CQH, Tan EL,Kanagalingam D. Decision to delivery interval and total duration of surgery for caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital. Singap Med J 2017; 58(6): 332

Mak SL. Maternal and fetal outcomes in extremely urgent caesarean delivery in relation to decision to delivery interval. J Obstet Gynaecol Midwifery 2015; 15(1): 16- 22

Hughes NJ, Namagembe I, Nakimuli A, Sekikubo M, Moffett A, Patient CJ.Decision to delivery interval of emergency caesarean section in Uganda: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Preg and Child 2017; 17(3): 411

Kotera A. The evaluation of decision to delivery interval in Category I emergency caesarean section: a report of six cases. JA Clinic Reports 2022; 8(32): 32- 34

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

How to Cite

Qadir Khan, M., Afridi, F. ., & S.Ghayur, M. . (2023). To Determine the Decision to Delivery Interval in Category I Emergency Caesarean Sections in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Peshawar. Journal of Gandhara Medical and Dental Science, 10(1), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-1.347