Role of Psychosocial Factors In Vicarious Traumatization: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Nazia Mustafa Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi.
  • hina Iqbal Islamia College Peshawar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.9-1.172

Keywords:

Vicarious Traumatization, Healthcare Professionals, Psychosocial Factors

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The present study aimed at investigating the role of psychosocial factors such as, gender, marital status, profession, and personal history of trauma in vicarious traumatization (VT).

METHODOLOGY:

Cross sectional study was conducted at various hospitals in Rawalpindi and Islamabad over the period of 6 months from January 2018 to June 2018. A sample of 170 healthcare professionals (doctors=39, psychiatrists=27, psychologists=36, nurses=30 and others=38) (men=67, women=103) was taken from various hospitals in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Data were collected by using the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale.

RESULTS:

Results revealed significant differences have been found among various groups of healthcare professionals (doctors, psychiatrist, psychologists, nurses and others) in whom psychiatrists are the most vulnerable group for vicarious traumatization and psychologists are the least vulnerable group. Moreover, healthcare professionals who are married and have personal history of trauma are more vulnerable for vicarious traumatization as compared to those who are unmarried and without personal history of trauma. No significant gender differences have been found among health care professionals on vicarious traumatization.

CONCLUSION:

The findings of present research have emphasized that vicarious traumatization must be addressed and identified in a health setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Nazia Mustafa, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi.

PhD Scholar,
Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi.

References

Udod S, Cummings GG, Care WD, Jenkins M. Role stressors and coping strategies among nurse managers. Leadership Health Serv. 2017;30(1):29-43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-04-2016-0015

Mustafa N, Haleem F, Khan NS, Sardar T, Akhtar MN, Mumtaz J. Relationship of vicarious traumatization with family relations and coping strategies among healthcare professionals. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2020;70(6):1925-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v70i6.5511

Niaz U. Women’s Mental Health in Disaster Psychiatry. In: Christodoulou GN, Mezzich JE, Christodoulou NG, Lecic-Tosevski D, editors. Disasters: Mental Health Context and Responses. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2016. p. 57-68

Kisner C, Colby LA, Borstad J. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. 7th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2018

Cuartero ME, Campos-Vidal JF. Self-care behaviours and their relationship with satisfaction and compassion fatigue levels among social workers. Soc Work Health Care. 2019;58(3):274-90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2018.1558164

Padmanabhanunni A. The cost of caring: secondary traumatic stress and burnout among lay trauma counsellors in the Western Cape Province. S Afr J Psychol. 2020;50(3):385-94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246319892898

Peled-Avram M. The role of relational-oriented supervision and personal and work-related factors in the development of vicarious traumatization. Clin Soc Work J. 2017;45(1):22-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0573-y

Murphy S, Elklit A, Chen YY, Ghazali SR, Shevlin M. Sex differences in PTSD symptoms: a differential item functioning approach. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2019;11(3):319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000355

Dekel R, Levinstein Y, Siegel A, Fridkin S, Svetlitzky V. Secondary traumatization of partners of war veterans: the role of boundary ambiguity. J Fam Psychol. 2016;30(1):63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000163

Cosden M, Sanford A, Koch LM, Lepore CE. Vicarious trauma and vicarious posttraumatic growth among substance abuse treatment providers. Subst Abuse. 2016;37(4):619-24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2016.1181695

Cetrano G, Tedeschi F, Rabbi L, Gosetti G, Lora A, Lamonaca D, et al. How are compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction affected by quality of working life? findings from a survey of mental health staff in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2726-x

Molnar BE, Meeker SA, Manners K, Tieszen L, Kalergis K, Fine JE, et al. Vicarious traumatization among child welfare and child protection professionals: a systematic review. Child Abuse Neglect. 2020;110:104679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104679

Masson F. Enhancing resilience as a self-care strategy in professionals who are vicariously exposed to trauma: a case study of social workers employed by the South African Police Service. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2019;29(1):57-75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1474159

Bride BE, Robinson MR, Yegidis B, Figly CR. The secondary traumatic stress scale. Res Soc Work Pract. 2003;13:1-16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t06768-000

Ahmed ZS, Yousaf F, Zeb K. Socio-economic and political determinants of terrorism in Pakistan: university students’ perceptions. Int Stud. 2018;55(2):130-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881718790689

Branson DC. Vicarious trauma, themes in research, and terminology: a review of literature. Traumatology. 2019;25(1):2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000161

Vasquez ML, Boel-Studt S. Integrating a trauma-informed care perspective in baccalaureate social work education: guiding principles. Adv Soc Work. 2017;18(1):1-24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/21243

Molnar BE, Sprang G, Killian KD, Gottfried R, Emery V, Bride BE. Advancing science and practice for vicarious traumatization/secondary traumatic stress: a research agenda. Traumatology. 2017;23(2):129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000122

Downloads

Published

2022-01-07

How to Cite

Mustafa, N. ., & Iqbal, hina. (2022). Role of Psychosocial Factors In Vicarious Traumatization: A Comparative Study. Journal of Gandhara Medical and Dental Science, 9(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.9-1.172